Process & gap mapping

Same process
Different execution across sites

The standard tells you what should happen. Teams can show you where workarounds begin and what they cost

Ink and watercolour illustration of production planners reviewing a schedule beside a factory floor
  1. 01

    Define the standard

    Agree which steps matter and what good practice looks like

  2. 02

    Compare local practice

    Compare how teams carry out the process through interviews with OREY AI voice agents

  3. 03

    Prioritise the gaps

    Find the costly gaps and the site routines worth testing elsewhere

What you get

See where weak processes cost you money

Compare local practice, estimate the time or money at stake and find routines worth trying elsewhere

Where is value at stake?

Link process gaps and workarounds to the line hours they cost

What differs locally?

See where teams depart from the standard, and who does better

What should we test?

Pick a stronger practice to adapt and the result to check

Process & gap mapping in practice

Find what sits behind the KPI gap

A KPI tells you where to look. Ask teams what changes from one site to the next

1 / 4
Illustrative photograph of production sites at work, with no identifiable faces

Typical KPI for production sites as a starting pointOEE

What holds OEE back across sites?

What may get in the way

Short stops, long changeovers and rework may have different causes at each site

What we would ask

Tell us about the last changeover that took longer than planned. Where did the time go?

What you then test

Try a preparation routine from a stronger site and see whether downtime falls

All production site use cases →

Hear what your people would say